The Gambia Bar Association (GBA) has formally expressed opposition to the proposed appointment of Mr. Edi M.O. Faal as Chief Justice, stating that he does not meet the constitutional qualifications required for the country’s highest judicial office.

The position emerged from an Emergency General Meeting convened on 6 July 2026, during which members of the legal body examined the eligibility of Mr. Faal under Section 139(2) of the Gambian Constitution. Following deliberations, members unanimously concluded that constitutional requirements for the appointment had not been satisfied.

In a statement issued on 9 July, the GBA clarified that its concerns are strictly constitutional and should not be interpreted as a reflection on Mr. Faal’s character, professional competence, or legal accomplishments. Instead, the Association emphasized that its intervention is focused solely on whether legal conditions governing appointment to the office have been met.

After reaching its decision, the GBA formally communicated its resolution to President Adama Barrow, the Judicial Service Commission, and the Attorney General and Minister of Justice, urging relevant authorities to carefully consider the constitutional issues before proceeding with the appointment process.

While noting that it rarely comments on judicial appointments, the Association explained that it considered this case exceptional because of what it describes as a significant constitutional question that should be resolved before any final decision is made.

For many observers, the development highlights the important role professional legal bodies play in safeguarding constitutional governance and maintaining public confidence in judicial institutions. It also underscores ongoing discussions about the balance between executive appointments and constitutional compliance within democratic systems.

The GBA says it will continue monitoring developments and remains prepared to take further action if necessary in fulfilment of its mandate to uphold the rule of law and defend the supremacy of the Constitution.